Iliyasu Gadu
08035355706 (sms only)
Sometime this year most likely in the second quarter, the Buhari administration will increase the pump price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) from the present price which hovers between N161 to N165 per litre to N340 per litre. From all permutations this move carries with it the potential to reverberate through the country in ways that will ignite actions that will aggravate its already tensile fabric.
The government hinges this move largely on the passage of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) which provides for the unbundling of the Nigeria National Petroleum Company (NNPC) into commercially run entities, thereby deregulating the entire operations of the oil and gas sector. One of the fallouts from this is that government will from the date of the take-off of these entities in the middle of this year as provided in the PIA, desist from direct intervention in the affairs of the sector of which the payment of ‘’subsidies’’ to ensure supply of fuel is identified as one of the prominent intervention mechanism in the sector.
The government prefers to call it removal of ‘’subsidy’’ rather than what it really is; increase in the prices of fuel. Calling it ‘’subsidy’’ removal reinforces the government claim to benevolence; spending beyond what is economically necessary and prudent to ensure steady supply of this commodity affordably to the people.
Further to the argument on benevolence, the government with elaborate paternalism has now come to claim the moral justification of removing this ‘’economically inefficient’’ humongous amount spent annually in ‘’subsidising’’ the supply of this commodity with the predictable explanation that such monies saved will be channelled towards providing and improving basic services like health care, transportation, education to the people. To make this argument convincing, government says that the ‘’subsidies’’ rather than benefit the people to whom it was meant, goes instead to the well-connected fat cats in the system who skim off huge profits through all kinds of shady practices. So if the ‘’subsidies’’ were removed, the inefficiencies embedded in the process will disappear allowing the principles of free market to govern the supply, marketing and pricing of the commodity to the advantage of all.
Figures amounting to N1.8 trillion are being bandied about as the cost to government on this ‘’subsidy’’. Not only have government spokesmen and spin doctors gone on a spin overdrive explaining why this figure is unsustainable, certain public figures have weighed in with the argument that the continued retention of the ‘’subsidy’’ makes Nigerian fuel prices cheapest in the West African sub-region, the result of which encourages cross border smuggling of the commodity. Some even came in with the hot ‘’intelligence’’ information that due to continuous flow of cheap oil from Nigeria through smuggling, neighbouring countries have shelved plans to build their own refineries to process their crude oil.
These arguments are as legion as they are ridiculous and disingenuous. It is the classic template that have been repeatedly regurgitated right from when military president Babangida introduced his Structural Adjustment Plans (SAP) under the auspices of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) when he shot his way to power in 1985. Since then every other government has dredged up these set of arguments to justify its implementation of IMF policies in the country. The Buhari administration despite its populist pretentions has been following in like manner with its devaluation, liberalization and removal of ‘’subsidies’’ since coming to power in 2015.
Because the government has tended to exclusively reserve to itself the wisdom of explaining and implementing the measure it has either inadvertently glossed over or deliberately chosen to ignore the fundamental contradictions in its presentations and positions on the ‘’subsidy’’ debate. And this is where the danger lies. The situation is akin to a driver with a full busload of passengers recklessly and dangerously on the highway who is at once oblivious to the dangers of his untoward behaviours and also impervious to protests and complaints from his passengers on his conduct. We are all too familiar with these unwholesome scenario on our roads and it is hardly surprising that our government is also adopting this posture on the ‘’subsidy’’ debate.
But we cannot allow such inane considerations deter us from critically analysing this very important issue which by the way transcends the realm of economics which the government wants us to focus only on. In reality the issue encompasses the political, social, security and sovereignty aspects of our lives as Nigerians. And in this wise the government will be doing a disservice to itself and to Nigerians if it considers this issue purely from a point of view of cost accounting or econometrics leaving the even more significant areas that the effect of the increase in fuel prices which it is now contemplating will bring to the country.
First off, what immediately registers in our minds on government’s position on the ‘’subsidy’’ debate is in the contradiction in the numbers. Government says it spends N1.8 trillion naira annually to ‘’subsidize’’ the supply of petroleum and to cushion the effect of this withdrawal it intends to make monthly direct cash transfers of N5000 to up to 40 million Nigerians in the vulnerability bracket as transportation ‘’subsidy’’ for a year following the withdrawal. Off head that amounts to N2 trillion. What this means is that government intends to spend N2 trillion to remove a ‘’subsidy’’ of N1.8 trillion!? How convincing is that?
Secondly, a government which wants to be taken seriously should not even talk about smuggling of a commodity across the borders as one of its reasons for removal of ‘’subsidy’’. How many trucks laden with petroleum products can cross the border illegally to matter and if so why aren’t the various government security outfits stationed at the border able to apprehend them?
By citing this reason as one of its pegs for removal of ‘’subsidy’’, government is inadvertently admitting to abdicating its primary responsibility of securing our borders from illegal infiltration and exfiltration. This amounts to a triple jeopardy on the people; failure to secure the borders, failure to protect the people and unjustifiably piling more economic hardship and misery on them for its multiple failures. (To be continued)
I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers
That is really interesting, You are an overly professional blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to in quest of more of your magnificent post. Additionally, I have shared your site in my social networks!
It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this brilliant blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!
Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog stand out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks a lot
I’m still learning from you, while I’m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely liked reading all that is written on your website.Keep the aarticles coming. I enjoyed it!
Great article. It’s very unfortunate that over the last ten years, the travel industry has already been able to to deal with terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, influenza, swine flu, and also the first ever true global economic collapse. Through it all the industry has really proven to be sturdy, resilient and dynamic, obtaining new tips on how to deal with trouble. There are generally fresh issues and chance to which the industry must just as before adapt and answer.
There is definately a great deal to learn about this topic.
I like all of the points you have made.